Alfred wrote:I presume you mean one glyph for ‘Welcome’ and another glyph for ‘Thank you for visiting’, not two glyphs for ‘Welcome and thank you for visiting’!
Yes.
I tend not to write it like that so as not to risk giving the impression of the meaning including the quote marks.
You can work around that quite easily by styling the text as bold, italic, and/or coloured:
… the glyphs for Welcome and Thank you for visiting have since had …
Continuing, Alfred wrote:I’m curious as to why you’ve chosen the passive voice, saying those glyphs ‘have since had an additional design produced’ rather than claiming ownership by saying ‘I have since produced an additional design’.
It was not a deliberate choice. I suppose something to do with how I was taught to write up experiments.
Thank you for the explanation.
Alfred wrote:(The additional designs are for new glyphs, not the existing glyphs, but that’s another issue.)
Yet interesting.
How exactly would my meaning be correctly worded?
You could simply say ‘alternative glyphs’, couldn’t you, unless I’m missing something?
]]>I presume you mean one glyph for ‘Welcome’ and another glyph for ‘Thank you for visiting’, not two glyphs for ‘Welcome and thank you for visiting’!
Yes.
I tend not to write it like that so as not to risk giving the impression of the meaning including the quote marks.
I’m curious as to why you’ve chosen the passive voice, saying those glyphs ‘have since had an additional design produced’ rather than claiming ownership by saying ‘I have since produced an additional design’.
It was not a deliberate choice. I suppose something to do with how I was taught to write up experiments.
(The additional designs are for new glyphs, not the existing glyphs, but that’s another issue.)
Yet interesting.
How exactly would my meaning be correctly worded?
]]>Alfred wrote:William wrote:Please find attached the font LOCSE977.TTF
Do you have any documentation that you can either provide here or link to on another site?
Actually, as best I remember, not as such.
There is the attached document which links glyph images to meanings localized into English, but the glyphs for Welcome and Thank you for visiting have since had an additional design produced, as used in the illustrations earlier in this thread.
I presume you mean one glyph for ‘Welcome’ and another glyph for ‘Thank you for visiting’, not two glyphs for ‘Welcome and thank you for visiting’!
I’m curious as to why you’ve chosen the passive voice, saying those glyphs ‘have since had an additional design produced’ rather than claiming ownership by saying ‘I have since produced an additional design’. (The additional designs are for new glyphs, not the existing glyphs, but that’s another issue.)
]]>The slide show includes some clip art not drawn by me, and a font not designed or produced by me.
The text is written by me.
]]>William wrote:Please find attached the font LOCSE977.TTF
Do you have any documentation that you can either provide here or link to on another site?
Actually, as best I remember, not as such.
There is the attached document which links glyph images to meanings localized into English, but the glyphs for Welcome and Thank you for visiting have since had an additional design produced, as used in the illustrations earlier in this thread.
]]>Please find attached the font LOCSE977.TTF
Do you have any documentation that you can either provide here or link to on another site?
]]>
