<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Alfred's Serif Users' Forums — A.I. and Jane Austen Pride and Prejudice Musical]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://punster.me/serif/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1177&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2026-02-19T08:03:02Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?id=1177</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: A.I. and Jane Austen Pride and Prejudice Musical]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=9490#p9490" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I’ve had a rethink! Duplicate threads generally result in discussions being split so that you have to look in two or more places to get the full picture, whether it’s people offering different solutions to the same problem or sharing their views on a particular topic.</p><p>I’m going to close this thread to new posts. Please continue the discussion <a href="https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?id=1176">here</a>.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Alfred]]></name>
				<uri>https://punster.me/serif/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-02-19T08:03:02Z</updated>
			<id>https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=9490#p9490</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: A.I. and Jane Austen Pride and Prejudice Musical]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=9489#p9489" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Ali wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Anyone using the New Posts view, as I do exclusively, is going to see multiple postings.</p></blockquote></div><p>I use it, too, but it’s clear that not everyone does! I’m sure I’ve even seen posts explicitly saying things along the lines of ‘This is the only section of these forums that I ever visit’.</p><p>Those of us who do use the New Posts view will see duplicate topic titles, making it immediately clear that cross-posting has occurred.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Alfred]]></name>
				<uri>https://punster.me/serif/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-02-19T07:47:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=9489#p9489</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: A.I. and Jane Austen Pride and Prejudice Musical]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=9486#p9486" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>FYI: Anyone using the New Posts view, as I do exclusively, is going to see multiple postings. It&#039;s not a problem per se, but if the forum were busy and lots of people were eager for feedback and doing it, then it would quickly became VERY annoying, which is why thread duplication is generally against a forum&#039;s rules. I have to deal with it as a moderator myself (not here, of course).</p><p>Cross-posting is when you post the same post to multiple forums; duplicate posting is the same thing, but within one forum.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Ali]]></name>
				<uri>https://punster.me/serif/profile.php?id=1092</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-02-19T07:35:25Z</updated>
			<id>https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=9486#p9486</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: A.I. and Jane Austen Pride and Prejudice Musical]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=9485#p9485" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>pberk wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Alfred, I&#039;m posting this twice as I&#039;m so eager for comment.&nbsp; Please remove if against some rule.</p></blockquote></div><p>Cross-posting is generally discouraged on any forum I’ve ever visited, but there’s certainly no rule against it on this low-traffic site.</p><p>My impression is that MoviePlus users tend not to visit the Art &amp; Literature forum, and <em>vice versa</em>. By posting to both forums you’re almost certainly reaching a wider audience than you otherwise would.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>pberk wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I can’t remember if I posted the version that included the songs but no visuals.&nbsp; Many people liked the music but wanted, at a minimum, something to visualize the story, maybe something like book illustrations.</p></blockquote></div><p>I’m confused, Paul! If you hadn’t posted a version without something akin to book illustrations, how would anyone come to the conclusion that they wanted to see them added?</p><p>The version that you posted previously showed Jane with her lips moving (and probably her eyes blinking) but her head faced slightly away from the camera and remained in that position throughout.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>pberk wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>My purpose is to entertain.&nbsp; Hopefully this work will be judged solely on that scale.</p></blockquote></div><p>I’ve never known you to fail in your purpose when posting. Thanks for sharing your work here.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Alfred]]></name>
				<uri>https://punster.me/serif/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-02-19T07:15:01Z</updated>
			<id>https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=9485#p9485</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[A.I. and Jane Austen Pride and Prejudice Musical]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=9484#p9484" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Alfred, I&#039;m posting this twice as I&#039;m so eager for comment.&nbsp; Please remove if against some rule.</p><p>I’ve just completed my Internet Musical version of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice.&nbsp; I can’t remember if I posted the version that included the songs but no visuals.&nbsp; Many people liked the music but wanted, at a minimum, something to visualize the story, maybe something like book illustrations.&nbsp; Now, I’ve gone much further than that as the technology to do so has arrived.&nbsp; It’s nearly a movie version now. </p><p>This is controversial, as many believe that only humans should be doing creative work, especially on public domain classics.&nbsp; Many of the Jane Austen Reddit forums do not allow any A.I. generated work, even A.I./Human collaborations, like mine. </p><p>My purpose is to entertain.&nbsp; Hopefully this work will be judged solely on that scale.</p><p>Pride and Prejudice Internet Musical … 65 min.<br /><a href="https://youtu.be/iLCU1FsKy-E">https://youtu.be/iLCU1FsKy-E</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pberk]]></name>
				<uri>https://punster.me/serif/profile.php?id=735</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-02-18T23:10:41Z</updated>
			<id>https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=9484#p9484</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
