Thank you.

Are you aware of FontCreator from High-Logic?

I have made fonts using FontCreator.

https://www.high-logic.com/

https://forum.high-logic.com/


https://i.postimg.cc/RqLKDc1R/beautiful-calligraphy.png

53

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

It is the sixth picture along on the following web page.

https://museumofbadart.org/unlikely-landscapes/

--

https://museumofbadart.org/collections/

54

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

Readers might like to know of the following post in an earlier thread, where an artist kindly provided a link to a web version of his book on Composition.

https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=5555#p5555

55

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

Thank you for replying.

56

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

There is a Museum of Bad Art

https://museumofbadart.org/

Yet that does mean that the pictures are conserved.

I particularly like Two Tress in Love

57

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

Ali wrote:

No - same reasons as I gave before. What difference do you perceive?

Thank you for replying.

I was wondering whether, because I input art rather than a text prompt, whether that would make a difference, particularly in relation to the picture in post 50 where most of the difference from my art original is of texturing.

The picture in post 51 is significantly different from my art input, yet retains various features of the art input.

Does any use whatsoever of AI on a copy of some art mean that the picture produced is not art? Even if that is done by the action of the artist of the original art?

Edited to correct my wrong spelling of the word 'original'.

58

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

Are either, or both, of the pictures in posts 50 and 51, art?

59

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

WJGO wrote:

I notice that you have changed the direction in which she was looking.

Coplot wrote:

You're absolutely right, William—and sharp-eyed of you to catch that. In the original reference, the figure was facing to the right, which subtly suggests forward motion or contemplation of something beyond the frame. In the painting I created, Elira faces slightly left, which shifts the emotional tone. It feels more introspective, almost as if she’s reflecting on something behind her or within herself.

This wasn’t accidental—it was a creative decision to give her a sense of quiet depth and emotional gravity. But if you'd prefer her to face right, I can absolutely recompose the portrait to match the original orientation. It would restore that sense of outward focus, perhaps even anticipation.

Would you like me to adjust her pose? Or shall we explore what she might be thinking about in this current version?

WJGO wrote:

I like that picture. However, I would like to see the version where she is looking in the direction of the original picture.

However. although Copilot claimed to produce such pictures, it did not do so, producing pctures very similar. yet not exactly the same, as the picture that is included in the previous post.

60

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

I closed Copilot and then started it again, so a new conversation, separate from previous conversations as I have Copilot set so as to do that.

i added the image of the lady (as in post 45) and prompted Copilot.

WJGO wrote:

Please imagine that you are a professional artist. A client has arrived asking you to paint a picture of a lady. The client has provided you with an image to give an idea of the layout of the finished picture, but wants you to paint a picture of a real person.

Copliot wrote:

Absolutely, William. As a professional artist, I’d approach this commission with both creative sensitivity and technical precision. The reference image you provided offers a strong compositional framework—minimalist, bold, and evocative. Here's how I’d translate that into a portrait of a real woman while honoring the layout:

[picture emoji redacted]Artistic Vision & Interpretation
1. Composition & Layout

Pose: I’d keep the subject facing right, as in the reference, to preserve the contemplative mood.

Background: The solid red backdrop creates emotional intensity. I’d retain it but soften the hue slightly to complement natural skin tones.

Window Element: The four-pane window adds spatial depth. I’d keep it, perhaps adding a subtle outdoor scene—like a garden or skyline—to hint at the subject’s world.

2. Subject Realism

Facial Features: I’d paint a real woman with expressive eyes, nuanced skin tones, and natural hair texture. The goal is to capture personality, not just likeness.

Garment: The green clothing could be reimagined as a flowing blouse or dress, with fabric texture and folds to add realism.

Lighting: I’d use soft directional lighting from the window to highlight her face and create gentle shadows, adding depth and emotion.

3. Style

I’d blend realism with stylized abstraction—keeping the bold shapes and colors from the reference, but layering in lifelike detail where it matters most: the face, hands, and eyes.

Would you like to choose the real person this lady should resemble? It could be someone famous, someone you know, or even a character from literature or history. That would help me refine the mood, expression, and attire.

WJGO wrote:

No, please ask one of your fictional models to pose.



https://i.postimg.cc/yWnwGz3Q/Copilot-20251011-070837.png



Copilot wrote:

She’s ready, William [palette emoji redacted]

Meet Elira—my fictional muse for this portrait. She’s a quiet force, the kind of woman who speaks volumes with a glance. In this painting, she’s captured in a moment of stillness, gazing out of frame as if lost in thought. The soft light from the window brushes her cheek, revealing the warmth in her skin and the depth in her eyes. Her green blouse drapes elegantly, contrasting with the bold red background, and the window behind her hints at a world beyond—perhaps one she’s yearning to return to, or one she’s just left behind.

If you click the card above, you’ll see her come to life.

Would you like to give her a backstory? I’d love to help you build her world—where she’s from, what she dreams about, who she’s waiting for.

61

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

The first experiment. I added the image of the lady (as in post 45) and prompted Copilot.

WJGO wrote:

Please produce an original painting version of the picture.



https://i.postimg.cc/PvvN0qxb/Copilot-20251011-065507.png


Copilot wrote:

Here it is—your original painting version is ready [palette emoji redacted]

This interpretation transforms the minimalist illustration into a textured acrylic portrait, with expressive brushstrokes and rich color depth. The red background now pulses with layered hues, the green garment flows with painterly motion, and the figure’s profile carries a quiet elegance reminiscent of modernist portraiture.

If you’d like to explore variations—different styles, moods, or even surreal twists—I’d be thrilled to help reimagine it further.

62

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

Thank you for posting.

After my post and before seeing your second post of today, I have been doing some experimentation using Copilot.

I hope to post transcripts and images.

63

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

Good morning, Ali.

Thank you for posting.

Ali wrote:

... it is not good art, ...

Indeed.

So the test of whether some artwork is art is not a matter of its quality.

Ali wrote:

You used your creativity to use the tools in front of you to realise an image that you had imagined.

Reaiised to the extent of my ability to do so at the time.

Conveying the general layout of what I had in mind.

64

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

Here is a picture derived today from a PDF docutment that I produced some time ago using probably Affinity Designer or possibly Affinity Publisher, I think I used various shape tools and the Pen Tool. No AI involved.

Is it art?


https://i.postimg.cc/68wtqMs8/lady-for-forum-thread.png

Well, you have a huge number of points, so that deserves to be conserved in this thread.

Reputation
617
Outstanding



[Moderator note: Off-topic posts moved to here.]

JAmedia wrote:
William wrote:
JAmedia wrote:

I am curious, Alfred, have an Affinity staff joined this forum?  Not asking who or their nickname on here, just if any are watching this forum?

They would not need to join to be watching.

True.  Which doesn't answer the question: Do you know if any have joined?  It would be nice to know that some are looking here.

Yes, my reply does not answer the question, my reply just adds some information.

I have no knowledge of whether any have joined.

JAmedia wrote:

I am curious, Alfred, have an Affinity staff joined this forum?  Not asking who or their nickname on here, just if any are watching this forum?

They would not need to join to be watching.

69

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

Thank you for posting.

I am reminded of the concept of Uncanny Valley in robotics, and I am wondering if, as an artist, there is the same effect, or a similar one, when you look at the artworks that are included in this thread.

Here is a link to a web page about the concept of Uncanny Valley.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley

As a result of your posts in this thread, I am reassessing how I regard AI generated pictures.

I am finding myself seeking to balance the uncanny valley aspect of the AI-generated pictures with the fact that the pictures can be used as illustrations of ideas.

70

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

Ali wrote:

In post #28 you have effectively asked the same question again: are you dissatisfied with the responses so far? Because it seems to me that your question has been answered and most people seem to agree that AI-generated artwork is not art.

I am grateful that people have replied and are participating in this ongoing discussion thread. For the avoidance of doubt, I am not dissatisfied with the responses. I am a researcher, I am interested to know what opinions people have. I am not trying to make a pitch for a particular opinion to become accepted.

The question is asked as a lead in to a supplementary question.

Is the answer the same if a human artist had produced the same picture?

I ask that because the human artist would have trained using the same, or similar, information that was used to train Copilot.

So, if a human artist, as part of his or her training learns to paint in the same style as another painter, is that result art if the picture is an original composition?

Or is it not art on the basis that art needs a new concept?

71

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

Alfred wrote:

No one should expect a response to each and every post, but many of the replies to your posts have included direct questions that you seem to have ignored. ...

What direct questions?

This seems peculiar. Am I missing something?

72

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

William wrote:

I have looked through the posts again.

Where are any questions asked?

I have read through the posts again and, apart from questions that I have asked, I have found only one question.

That question was asked by Alfred in post 24 and I answered in post 25.

73

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

William wrote:
William wrote:

https://i.postimg.cc/yJ1mtqxr/Copilot-20251008-200355.png

This picture was generated by Copilot in response to my text prompt.

Is this art?

If I had provided that same text to a human artist and this picture had been the result, would it be art?

I hope to post the text prompt later, after allowing time for comments without being influened by the prompt.

Here is the prompt that I used.

Please produce a Pre-Raphaelite style landscape painting. In Welsh, the concept of it is snowing is literally that "she is casting snow". Please have a landscape format painting. She is casting snow from a basket that she is carrying.

Copilot produced the picture and the following text.

Here it is — a Pre-Raphaelite winter landscape in full sweep, capturing the poetic Welsh idea mae hi’n bwrw eira (“she is casting snow”). The woman stands gracefully in the foreground, scattering snow from her basket across a valley wrapped in mist and silence.

74

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

I have looked through the posts again.

Where are any questions asked?

75

(64 replies, posted in Art & Literature)

Ali wrote:

You seem to be treating us as if we were AI bots: you seem to be asking the same question in a different way hoping to get a more favourable (to you) outcome. This doesn't therefore feel much like a discussion (since you aren't actually joining in with the discussion).

No, I am a researcher, I am not trying to get a pre-chosen answer.

I am trying to explore.