Happy Christmas everyone https://youtu.be/qUguIdZnx8g
Thanks Gordon and Sue .. Happy Christmas and a healthy New Year ..
An independent forum site for members of the Serif software community
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Automated signup has been disabled for these forums. If you wish to register, please send an email to admin[at]punster[dot]me stating your preferred username.
Embedded images: Click on the Add image to post link below the message box. Your photo will be uploaded to the postimage website and then shared here via a thumbnail link. Click on the thumbnail for a larger view.
Private messages: There is no pop-up alert for new PMs on these forums, so you need to look out for the PM link (near the top right-hand corner of any forum page) becoming bold.
Alfred's Serif Users' Forums → Posts by pberk
Happy Christmas everyone https://youtu.be/qUguIdZnx8g
Thanks Gordon and Sue .. Happy Christmas and a healthy New Year ..
Hi,
I intend to make a site with links to many quizes and other stuff (mine).
Till now I would add a new quiz and then add a link to index and then each time I have to publish it again and again.
Is there a way to make this index site in such way it will refresh each time I add a new link?
Something like this:
http://quizoftheday.co.uk/Thank you! regards, Natasa
This is an interesting question on Webplus 8 ... there must be a solution. Perhaps a PHP script?
Has anyone had an issue with the audio player not working in Edge or Chrome? I always test it before I upload the changes to the web site, but I have one user that gets an error for the Navigation.user.Agent source not found using an Edge Browser. I use Edge in Windows 10 & 11 and on 4 different PCs and it works fine. I did not know that FireFox will not play mp3 files so I did check the option to play .ogg files in that case and converted the mp3 files to ogg files and placed them in the same directory. The only thing I can think of is that some of her web settings may be corrupt or there is a 3rd party blocker that is preventing the mp3 files from playing. is anyone else having this issue?
No issues here playing mp3 files using Edge, Chrome or Firefox using audio player.
You say you "test" before uploading changes, do you upload the "test" page so as to see how it is working on your server? I'd try to narrow down the problem using a "test" page that is uploaded.
Thanks Paul. Did we see you three times - in a suit then orange then blue shirt? If so you haven't changed much!
Yes. That's me --- as I was in my youth ... ahhhhhh .. the memory of being limber and full of energy.
I'll get some other examples of old film in a few days.
Christmas challenge for film and video makers
Do you remember the first movie you made years ago? Full of errors you wouldn't make now! Can you grab it and post for old times sake? Mine was in Easter 1967 when I went on a "safari" around South London parks "In search of Squirrels" https://vimeo.com/781392655
We don't have squirrels here in NZ. They didn't get here naturally and early European settlers didn't bring any. Unfortunately they brought plenty of other pests which have been very harmful to our native wildlife.
Your beginning efforts Eric (Squirrels) were good .. far steadier than mine. I would say your approach was more directed at a general audience whereas even my earliest efforts were more "home movies". We put ourselves in the movies. But clearly the camera work was shaky and frenetic. I wish we had settled down and made cleaner, clearer shots but it does show my friend Bill and myself, age 18 on a trip after being liberated from High School. I remember we did a film and slide show for our parents when we got back. The whole thing was more than 30 min.
So here's about 2 minutes of that film project of 1962. The digital transfer is poor. The titles and music were added circa 2006 ?? https://youtu.be/Bsw2zbRGegs
Until today I hadn’t heard of either Henry Head or Russell Brain, both of whom were English neurologists.
Two examples I remember from past American politics were Congressmen John Doolittle of California and Tom DeLay of Texas.
Gordon - I did my transfers around 16 years ago using the crude method of copying with a digital video camera off a small screen onto which the film was projected. The quality varied from good to barely acceptable depending on the quality of the original.
Eric and Gordon .... Eric's transfer method is what I'd call an "optical" transfer to digital. Remarkable. I've never seen anyone achieve such high quality with that method.
I did some transfers like that with mediocre results so I finally bought (about 8 years ago) a "Retroscan Universal" that could do a digital scan frame by frame. It was expensive, but when I added up the cost of paying someone else to do the job, it seemed worth it. I had a fair amount of 16mm, Super 8mm and Reg 8mm to transfer. The hardest thing was doing the 16mm release prints that included sound.
Here's a small sample of the results off the "Retroscan Universal" .. https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/158708010/privacy
Just a quick update. I have now cleared the cache but still cannot watch Samoa. The strange thing is that I can watch some of Eric's older videos like the one made in 2015 featuring the insects in his back garden, etc., but as for Samoa...
I'll see if I can watch it with my Alexa device.
Albert .. I may have found the problem. Eric's video is "unrated" and Vimeo says this: "Selecting a rating is encouraged. If your video is unrated, viewers in certain countries won't be able to access it even if you make it public."
My Norton Simon video was also unrated. I just added a rating of "For all audiences".
Can you see my video now? https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/11197112
Is that really your recorded narration 40 years ago? You sound the same.
Yes, when I put my audio visuals and my old 8mm film movies into digital I still had my original reel to reel tapes and my Akai tape deck. Apart from one, my tapes, some going back to the 60s in UK, were in good condition. Most were Scotch Dynarange. I transferred the tape contents to my pc. All my analogue material and equipment has now long gone.
Here's something different again. An 8mm film movie made in 1969 https://vimeo.com/33854096
Outstanding Eric .. Beautiful restoration work .. who could have dreamed of such a thing in 1969? You've documented a bit of history -- I imagine the men shown in the video have mostly gone to their rest ???
pberk wrote:Albert Ross wrote:How come I have to log in in order to watch Samoa? Not being a member it's not possible, any ideas?
Here's what I get when I use Eric's link to the Samoa video ... AS you can see I'm not signed into Vimeo .. I do have a 'Free" account at vimeo but I don't sign in to see Eric's video.
Can you post the screen you get?
Strange. Vimeo says you don't need an account to watch a video if you have the link and the video is unlisted (meaning not private) .. Try this one of mine. Can you see it? https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/11197112
How come I have to log in in order to watch Samoa? Not being a member it's not possible, any ideas?
Here's what I get when I use Eric's link to the Samoa video ... AS you can see I'm not signed into Vimeo .. I do have a 'Free" account at vimeo but I don't sign in to see Eric's video.
Can you post the screen you get?
Here's something different. As most of you head into winter and here it's a miserable wet "summer" afternoon. A 1981 visit to the tropics.
It's an audio visual (I had 25 years AWOL from movie making). Originally a dual projector slide show with audio on a cassette tape. One track for a speaker and the other with instructions fed to an earpiece that fitted over my ear. This came in useful when I recreated on a Movie Plus timeline. The audio is the original so it's me 40 plus years ago.
My first visit to Samoa in 1981. I subsequently spent two years there in 1982 - 1984. A lot has changed since both there and worldwide. https://vimeo.com/147280337
Is that really your recorded narration 40 years ago? You sound the same.
Sorry Paul, it's a typo. Should have read AWOL (Absent without leave). Possibly not a saying used in your part of the world. I'll correct my post.
AWOL .. Thanks .. I certainly know what that is from my days in the US Army -- I'm sure they still use that term.
(I had 25 years AOL from movie making).
Quick question Eric .. what do you mean by AOL ?
GStree wrote:The dictionary describes a "Geode" as a "small" cavity in rock, lined with crystals or other mineral matter, however in 1999 at Pulpi (that is not too far up the coast to us in Spain) the largest mineral geode in Europe was discovered in an old iron mine. We have driven past it many times over the years and decided one day to take a look at it.
There was a lot of walking involved on the day with the different levels that were only accessible by stairways,but since I made this video, I understand that lift shafts have been installed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=541y82eO5WU&tThanks Gordon. I agree with Paul voice over would have helped to explain what we are seeing. Bear in mind some viewers will be watching your video on a phone so reading a board of text would be impracticable.
I find the audio side of making a video more demanding than the image editing. Researching, writing, recording and tidying up narration to drop onto the timeline takes effort. Then there's the cutting into sections and finalising the editing. I only do this when my narration is on its track as often a clips length is governed by my narration. Then there's the finding of appropriate music and the mixing of audio, music, camera audio and any additional effects.
Very few of my videos don't have narration probably because I've a story to tell. This SD "North Head" from 2010 is a good example. Unfortunately being SD the quality looks poor nowadays https://vimeo.com/31188015
Excellent Eric .. Everything flows nicely. Not too little – not too much. You succeed because the piece is full of interesting information with clear and steady visuals to match, and your narration is delivered in a pleasant, authentic manner.
I fully agree that audio is often the biggest challenge if you choose to do more than just a music track. Yes, researching and writing the narration cues can be lots of work. BUT – I learn so much more about the place after we have been there. To me, this is the best part of doing the videos in the first place.
In my case, getting good “live” sound at the time of shooting is an even bigger challenge. Every situation is different but getting your microphone as close as possible is the best.
Like Gordon, I sometimes use a separate “wild” sound recorder. That helps too.
I invested in some good audio software that does a fairly good job of dialogue de-noise. This has helped a lot. But software background noise-reduction can only go so far, sometimes it’s back to how we did things in the olden days, dialogue replacement. On occasion, I “loop” or “dub” the sound. It’s easier than you think. Here’s an example.
Dialogue replacement .. 2 min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFCfYV0-yTY
I never heard of this .. Certainly a wonder of nature .. Good video work ..
I'd would have narrated instead of the lengthy title cards, used more live sound and sought out comments from others in the group .. but that's me -- It's your memory of the experience, (what caught your eye) so in that sense it's perfect as it is.
It's interesting that this has become a tourist attraction. But why not? And I'm quite sure the video, nor any pictures, capture the impact of seeing something like this in person.
Thanks for posting.
pberk wrote:This video is from 2015. It's long, 22 minutes, but worthwhile for anyone interested in "Cunard" history. The video was shot at Cunard's 175th Anniversary concert held in the Liverpool Cathedral. It was a grand affair, attending by several thousand people. We are old Cunarders over the past 25 years, hence we felt very lucky to be there. Considering the conditions ( I was merely a member of the audience), I'm very proud of the filming and editing.
Wow that was excellent, I appreciate how good that is considering from where you were seated! Was "all" of it recorded on the day or did you use extra footage from somewhere else?
Yes, the editing is first class and I would think that it took a fair bit of time to finish? also what camera was you using at the time.
I did use other footage/stills from Internet sources to fill in the gaps, but all the singers and speakers were shot at the concert. I used my trusty NX30U Sony, which has fairly good stabilization built in. I made use of the Digital zoom too to get closer shots. -- AND there was that giant TV screen too which gave me a nice way to do transitions as I could fill that screen with any image I desired. I also used a separate audio recorder to take audio of the entire concert, as well as the live sound from the NX30U. I also obtained a better sound track of the concert from an Internet source. To my knowledge, Cunard has never released a DVD or Video of this event, although I did see multiple Television cameras positioned in the cathedral. The sound was a big challenge which I think worked out well.
One other factor is experience. This was not my first event like this. It did take a fair amount of effort and time to edit. But it was a labor of love. My goal was to get it down to 15 min. So, in that sense, I failed. But my wife always wants these video memories to be longer -- not shorter. If I cut things too much, she notices. So it's too long for general audiences but, for us, on a cold winter's night, just right.
Do you have any Cunard experience?
This video is from 2015. It's long, 22 minutes, but worthwhile for anyone interested in "Cunard" history. The video was shot at Cunard's 175th Anniversary concert held in the Liverpool Cathedral. It was a grand affair, attending by several thousand people. We are old Cunarders over the past 25 years, hence we felt very lucky to be there. Considering the conditions ( I was merely a member of the audience), I'm very proud of the filming and editing.
Thinking about Alaska today .. we are scheduled to go back in July 2023 .. We've been there many, many times. We especially love the enchanted forest at Icy Strait Point.
Icy Strait .. 4 min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_ED-ix_D1Y
GB wrote:I find both Gordon's and Paul's video most interesting. Albert's and Eric's too. Keep 'em coming, please.
Ditto. And ditto. And ditto.
As a side note, near the beginning of Paul’s video there’s a classic fail in the autogenerated captions. It says: “and who are you I am deaf”!!
OMG .. never realized that ..
GStree wrote:Is there anyone out there !!!!
Yes. I'm here. I'll post something soon.
Since it is quiet around here, I thought I’d post a little film I made a few years back. It was inspired by Ingmar Bergman’s “The Seventh Seal”. It grapples with the ultimate subject, one we all face in the end. It runs about 6 min.
The Unknowing ..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lnMMCyXVrk
Is there anyone out there !!!!
Yes. I'm here. I'll post something soon.
... but is there any similarity at all?
William
Yes and No. It's hard for me to say since I don't understand enough. But --- it seems to me the hotel system is in a state of superposition in that there is a 50% chance that the same name guests are the same person, and a 50% chance they are different people. It is impossible to know, until one of them is observed.
I think Entanglement is something different since both guests would be part of the same system but opposites. SO if one entangled guest were to check in and be given an odd numbered room, the other would instantly be known to be checking in and given an even numbered room. Something like that.
The whole thing is mind bending.
So is quantum entaglement something like that, information retained in two pieces that were once together?
Not exactly. On a Quantum scale (sub atomic -- inside the atom), particles such as electrons can become entangled when they are created near each other and they overlap and share the same properties. The strange thing is that no matter how far apart the entangled particles become, we can tell things about each of them by examining just one of them. So, for example, if they are entangled electrons, they both have the property of spin. But we don’t know which way they are spinning, clockwise or counter clockwise unless we look (measure). When we look, if we find that one particle is spinning clockwise, we know that the other (if measured) is spinning the opposite, counter-clockwise. How does that other particle know which way to spin – and how does it know it INSTANTLY no matter the distance?
It's hard to understand. I believe, no one fully understands how this happens but there have been numerous experiments that seem to prove it is so. One of these just won the Nobel Prize for Physics. This little 5 min video might help.
I remember years ago seeing something, quite possibly on television, but maybe in a magazine, where someone said, or wrote, that as homeopathy uses such extreme dilutions, if homeopathy works then that must mean it works by some mechanism of which we presently (that is, at the then present time) know nothing.
Now there is quantum entanglement being discussed.
And it made me wonder.
I remember long ago reading a science fiction story called "Not in the literature".
I had a quick look on the web. I have not found it. I don't remember who is the author.
William
Unlike entanglement, homeopathy is not generally accepted within the science community. The Similia Principle (like cures like) has little foundation in science. The extreme dilution you mention may give rise to the placebo effect. Frankly, I put it all on a par with Astrology.
Entanglement is not understood but has been repeatedly proven to exist in carefully controlled experiments. It is truly a deep mystery as it appears to able to violate the speed of light -- or does it?
Alfred's Serif Users' Forums → Posts by pberk
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.