"She stood and looked", or "she is standing and is looking". Not "she stood and is looking". Maybe she looked as if she was standing.
I'm just sat sitting here, not stood standing. I can't stand sitting too long.
An independent forum site for members of the Serif software community
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Automated signup has been disabled for these forums. If you wish to register, please send an email to admin[at]punster[dot]me stating your preferred username.
Embedded images: Click on the Add image to post link below the message box. Your photo will be uploaded to the postimage website and then shared here via a thumbnail link. Click on the thumbnail for a larger view.
Private messages: There is no pop-up alert for new PMs on these forums, so you need to look out for the PM link (near the top right-hand corner of any forum page) becoming bold.
Alfred's Serif Users' Forums → Posts by GB
"She stood and looked", or "she is standing and is looking". Not "she stood and is looking". Maybe she looked as if she was standing.
I'm just sat sitting here, not stood standing. I can't stand sitting too long.
Better now?
Better grammatically perhaps, but that somewhat changes the meaning. William is imagining Angela in the present, not the past.
I can imagine Angela stood there
There you go again!
The one and only Dale Cook has a tutorial here https://community.serif.com/tutorials/d … s-pageplus
In Geoff's version the meaning has changed.
Edward works at the research centre where Edith is the Secretary-General. So Edith often sees Edward. Edith usually only sees Angela at social events, when Angela is Edward's guest.
I'm sorry. Not having read the earlier parts of the story I am unaware of the exact relationship between the characters, or how informally they ma speak.
I try to write so as that if a movie is made of the novel then the words to speak are ready to use.
In my view that is a serious problem. You are writing a novel, not a play. You need more background information, setting the scene, describing the surroundings etc. There is a lot going on that the characters would not mention, but which would inform and interest the reader.
I like the way that Geoff has Angela "joining the small throng".
You said she was "alone". She was not, there were lots of people around her. However she was "on her own" in that she had no immediate companions with her.
It is an ugly passage. Perhaps "The Editor......who was standing......, was confronting her."
You may find this site interesting: https://mistakeswritersmake.com/sat-and … 5-and-116/
I find your style of writing very difficult. Just as an example of how I think a good editor could help, and I'm not making any claims to being such, take your opening passage, shown in the illustration.
I would suggest that it would be better written thus:
Edith approaches Angela and Edward and greets them as old friends.
“Angela,” she asks, “sorry to be a nuisance and interrupt your conversation, but could I ask Edward to come and look at the audio system which seems to be having problems?”
“Yes, that’s OK,” replies Angela.
Edward goes with Edith to inspect the audio, while Angela, now on her own, joins the small throng browsing the items on display - until, that is, they are interrupted by a loud, angry voice demanding, “What are you doing here?"
The background chatter is silenced, and eyes are directed at the figure of the Editor of Trade Magazine, who is angrily confronting a disbelieving Angela.
Julia, who was nearby, intervenes, politely asking the Editor if she can be of assistance.
“I want to know what this girl,” he says, pointing rudely at Angela, “is doing here.”
You, and others may disagree.
By the way, your clause "Editor ..... is stood" begs the question, "by whom?" I think you mean "is standing".
Professional or not, good editors do not rewrite. They will suggest changes, but it is up to the author to act on them or ignore them. What little I've read of your past novels suggests to me that you do need a good editor.
Changing the clocks twice a year doesn't really worry me. It's been going on for as Long as I've lived, and I'm used to it. In the US the advanced clock during the summer is misnamed as "Daylight Saving Time". That is not what it is or was intended to be. It was supposed to give a saving in power usage. If that is not what it does these days, then it should be done away with. Logically that means that we should stay on "winter" time, that is the real, natural, solar time all year round, not try to kid ourselves that the sun is out of sync!
The times one gets up or goes to bed, or has to get work or the shops etc will automatically be adjusted over time to suit what most people want. No one is prevented from getting up an hour earlier if they want to.
On my working visits to Spain, which despite being farther west than most of the UK, is on Central European time with France, Germany etc,, it was obvious that their population's real daytime had been adjusted to suit. 9am seemed to be the earliest "starting work" time, and at midnight the streets of Madrid were very much still alive, even with young children around.
Perhaps Britain should adopt CET, but as the home of Greenwich, it would be more logical to use GMT at all times.
"...you cannot fool all the people all the time." quoth Abe Lincoln.
The Senate has just decided to do just that. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/15/senate- … anent.html
Can't we just stick to real solar time, or should clock faces be redesigned?
wore him for a boutonniere
I presume this is some pun of carnation.
I've concluded that the USA is the nearest thing to it.
Thanks, Alfred. Yes it looks interesting. I'll give it a try. I've never used WordPad either. PagePlus is my usual application for any writing, or Lotus WordPro - now a bit outdated, but still has some useful unique features.
Alfred is correct. It was the heading UK&NI that I was referring to.
I have always understood the the French are to be blamed for the title "Great Britain". The northern French province the British call Brittany is called Bretagne by its natives. Grande-Bretagne is what they call the land to the north across La Manche. The economical French language does not differentiate the subtleties of big, large and great, so Grande-Bretagne simply means Large Britain. The British seem to prefer the more flattering translation of "great" with its more grandiose meanings!
It's interesting that now that the UK is getting closer to breaking up, it seems to have been decided that the international identification plate for road vehicles will be changed from GB to UK. What will happen to GBM, GBJ, GBG etc?
Is NI no longer included in UK?
It's also Mardi Gras, Shrove Tuesday and Pancake Day. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzmA-mQo0Fs
Don’t eat too many daffodils!
No chance. They haven't bloomed here yet.
Thoughts of Dave Paddock, whose birthday this was, and who always celebrated with a daffodil sandwich!
I don't think one could achieve chords with a complex mallet - ie striking more than one key simultaneously
But one can using two or three separate mallets? It doesn't really matter - ears are not that sensitive. Even chords on a piano do not necessarily have all the keys struck precisely simultaneously, nor could that happen with your idea of stacked keys. (It definitely does not happen on a guitar.) Besides the slight flexibility of the mallets would probably compensate adequately. However, I was not suggesting that seriously, or even at all. It was a question for William.
This guy seemed to manage quite well with only one mallet per hand. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDGqBJNU6t0 Who needs chords?
I shall not do so now in protest
I rather like threads going slightly off the main topic with a bit of humour. It will never resume with the main subject if people take umbrage and sulk. You must just put up with anything Alfred allows. It's his forum. After all the Cat piano does have much in common with your chord xylophone. Neither exists, and I do not think they would be very useful if they did! ![]()
How about answering the on topic question I posed?
Impossible not to think of Rossini
Or this version https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WZonn4d98M
I am wondering if one could have a chord xylophone, where narrow bars are in groups of three or four and one uses a single wide mallet to strike the three or four bars in the group simultaneously.
A xylophone uses wooden keys. I think it would be extremely difficult to make keys producing the correct note narrow enough to be so closely spaced as to be capable of being struck by a single mallet.
Why not use a three-headed mallet?
you’ll see a different number depending on the ambient lighting conditions and your display brightness and contrast settings
As I suggested above. However my (and Gordon's) settings must be pretty good because the full number was apparent without too much difficulty and without tweaking. The outer figures however did call for close attention.
There are some similar "tests" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mnl5Cd38JYU. Yes, I got them too! I suppose my ophthalmologist is doing a good job!
I'm not sure what William was concerned about - but that's just William, I suppose.
Careful what you post, you may be putting personal medical information on the internet.
I think it more likely that you will be showing the limits of your particular screen and/or video card.
3452839
Alfred's Serif Users' Forums → Posts by GB
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.