Topic: Why do they do it?
I have three given names.
For some things I use just the first initial, like signing for a delivery, followed by my surname.
However for anything formal, I use three initials followed by my surname. I never ever use "just the first two".
Yet I have found, over the years, that some people are unable or unwilling to copy my name from one document to another.
For example, more than once, I have written a letter, signed with three initials and my surname, with my three initials and surname below my signature in capitals for clarity, and the reply has just the first two initials and my surname.
Why?
Once, in the 1970s, I worked somewhere and, from time to time, I wrote a letter out in longhand as a draft, for it to be typed on the employer's stationery. The person doing the typing would later bring it to me for signing. The lady who normally typed letters for me had always typed all three of my initials. One day, she had had a lot on from her core work as a senior secretary, so the letter got typed by someone else.
She had omitted the initial of my third given name.
I politely mentioned this and was amazed when she said that the lecturer at her typing course at the local college had told her to only use the first two initials if someone had more than two. Fancy that being taught in a college!
It just seems strange to me that some people, but not everybody, seem to think it is reasonable or even desirable to not include more than two initials.
I am genuinely puzzled by this phenomenon.
William