William wrote:
William wrote:

Wednesday

What shall we discuss today?

If there are no other suggestions, giclée printing.

Now it is Thursday and here is a giclée print related puzzle, which is based on what I am doing. I have my solution, I wonder if others get the same.

...

Add a 3 mm bleed area at each of the four edges. What is that in pixels?

The question is part of the puzzle.

William wrote:

Wednesday

What shall we discuss today?

If there are no other suggestions, giclée printing.

Now it is Thursday and here is a giclée print related puzzle, which is based on what I am doing. I have my solution, I wonder if others get the same.

Making an artwork file for an A6 landscape giclée print. 300 pixels per inch.

The picture is 1024 pixels square.

This one.

https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=4035#p4035

The rest is white space.

Let us say x pixels above the picture and y pixels below the picture, with y greater than x. Also x and y are in the golden ratio to each other.

The left side white space, z, is the geometric mean of x and y, that is, z is the square root of x times y.

Add a 3 mm bleed area at each of the four edges. What is that in pixels?

528

(112 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Adelheid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB2u_RaKGFw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5N9wGCb0bg&t=116s

529

(112 replies, posted in General Discussion)

BZN with "Poor Old Joe".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSl28IcnYVY

and in a medley with two other songs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCfOCiOWulU

And even diamonds in her hair.

> Sorry, this episode is not currently available

Oh, oh, oh!

They get the licence fee!

Alfred wrote:

Actually, I’m curious about your choice of topic title and OP. You can’t prescribe a lively discussion, you can only start it and hope that it becomes lively.

Well I was bored and fancied a continuous discussion like we used to have, both here and in the old lounge.

Alfred wrote:

Why have you bumped a couple of other threads with nothing more than the word ‘bump’?

This is offered as an explanation not as an excuse or justification.

Because I was trying to access them and they were taking time to find. So I bumped the threads so as to be able to find them more easily.

Yet maybe as a side effect the prior existing content might be noticed and perhaps enjoyed by a few of the newer readers.

Alfred wrote:
William wrote:

I wanted to recover a particular AI-generated picture of a lady reading haiku to an elephat, at the full 1024 pixel by 1024 pixel size.

Find the picture in a thread, click on it, click on the enlarged image, download the full size image to local storage.

But the picture in page 6 of the modalities thread won't enlarge twice, I can only get the 800 pixel by 800 pixel version.

I wonder why.

My best guess would be that you only uploaded the 800 pixel by 800 pixel version.

I wondered if that is what happened, but I would be surprised if I had done that as that would have meant me preparing a version that size and 800 by 800 is not a size I use as best I remember. I mean, 800 is not a fifth part of A3 or anything like that, which is the way I have tended to do things.

I wanted to recover a particular AI-generated picture of a lady reading haiku to an elephat, at the full 1024 pixel by 1024 pixel size.

Find the picture in a thread, click on it, click on the enlarged image, download the full size image to local storage.

But the picture in page 6 of the modalities thread won't enlarge twice, I can only get the 800 pixel by 800 pixel version.

I wonder why.

However, I managed to get the desired result from the picture that is in the illustrated stories thread.

Readers who are wondering about the reason for the composition may like the following posts.

https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=6686#p6686

https://punster.me/serif/viewtopic.php?pid=6687#p6687

William

bump

bump

No other posters in this thread today it seems.

William wrote:

Wednesday

What shall we discuss today?

If there are no other suggestions, giclée printing.

Right then, giclée printing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gicl%C3%A9e

Wednesday

What shall we discuss today?

If there are no other suggestions, giclée printing.

I remember one where Terry Scott and June Whitfield, playing a married couple, are in a solicitor's office, and June says, about a court hearing,  something like

"It's a good job he can't represent himself"

and the solicitor says

"Oh but he can"

And Terry's face lights up.

In a later scene he is in court, dressed for the part in a gown and possibly a wig, and after a while the judge, discovering he is not a solicitor, asks where he got them and Terry replies "From a theatrical costumier"

I seem to remember he won the case as June had been in his car and accused of running into a council dust cart.

The driver of the dust cart said when questioned something like "She was parked right behind me" and Terry calls out "Parked".

I don't know why Terry was in court representing himself, possibly because he was the registered keeper of the car, but that is just me speculating on that.

541

(0 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Saint George's Day

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Geo … _(Uccello)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Legend

542

(12 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Sandie Shaw was good too. 1967

And Nicole. 1982

Oh, and

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jVM72GP_a8

Leonard Rossiter appears in a serious role in the film 2001 A Space Odyssey.

He plays the role of the scientist on the space station.

A speaking role.

Doing those sums was fun.

Thank you, Joe.

And thank you, Albert, for posting.

William

And for those other two "perms",

For the 12 one, multiply the 165 by 12 and divide by 4, so, as 12 divided by 4 is 3, multiply 165 by 3,

so that is (100 + ((200/3) - (5/3))  times 3,

which is 300 + 200 - 5 = 495

For the 13 one, multiply the 495 by 13 and divide by 5,

So (500 - 5) divided by 5 is (100 - 1)

(100 - 1) times 13 = 1300 - 13 = 1287

Yay!

Albert Ross wrote:

"... do you think a Labour government can be true to its socialists beliefs operating in a capitalist society? A question that seems to be oh so contrived, is, in my opinion a very valid one, only problem with it, is that by its very nature, is political, and as such should not be asked in a public forum, ...

Well, why not ask it in a public forum?

A discussion in this particular forum could be sensibly polite on the topic, with a culture of no political posturing.

Regarding the man reading out the football results how he used to change the tone of his voice in how he said the name of the team depending on the result.

Like,

(Cheerfully) Blues 7 (Sorrowfully) Reds 1

Or

(Sorrowfully) Greens 2, (Cheerfully) Yellows 25

Joe wrote:

Do you remember how they calculated the number of lines i.e. 8 from 11 = 165 lines

Clicking on the picture enlarges it.

I note that they refer to PERMS, which I think might mean permutations. But I think that they would really be combinations, becuase, if I remember from school mathematics, in a permutation the order matters whereas in a combination it does not.

So, for example, suppose a woman has one red ribbon, one yellow ribbon and one blue ribbon.

If she is to choose first a ribbon to tie in her hair, then one to tie on the handle of her handbag, then there are six possibilities. Three possibilities for the first choice, then two possibilities for the second choice, so six possible results.

However, if she is to choose first a ribbon to tie in her hair, then a second ribbon to tie in her hair, then there are six possibilities of the choices, yet only three possible results as the two chosen ribbons are treated equally, so the order of choosing is unimportant.

But back to the football pools "PERM".

How do we get 165 from 8 out of 11?

Not knowing from the football pools application but from the maths classes, it is something like, eleven choices times ten choices times nine choices times ... four choices, divided by one times two times three times ... eight.

So lots of them cancel out, leaving eleven times ten times nine, divided by one times two times three.

So what is that?

Changing ten divided by two to five, and changing nine divided by three to three leaves eleven times five times three.

So eleven times fifteen.

Thirten squared is 169.

Thirteen minus eleven is two.

Two squared is 4.

169 - 4 = 165

How about that! Yay!

There is always the next month's draw: I could win a million pounds.

I never did the football pools or the lottery.

I do have some premium bonds though.

A very British type of thing are premium bonds, like when the currency was decimalised the introduction of the 50p coin with the seven curved pieces round the edge and rounded joins between them.