126

(7 replies, posted in General Discussion)

Actually Alfred it's Winter Solstice for some of us.

127

(11 replies, posted in General Discussion)

William is back so presumably he is okay.

128

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

Thanks Paul.  Cemeteries are interesting places.

I've been having to sit around lately resting a leg, playing 50s and 60s music on CDs and reminiscing.  It's over two years now since I made the move into my retirement village.  A bigger change in lifestyle than I realised.  A good move, so here from 2021 "On the Move".  https://vimeo.com/513632928 I probably posted it on the old Serif forum

129

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

Thanks Gordon.  We have the Australian version of the Swamp Hen here known as Pukeko.

I'm feeling nostalgic tonight so here's something different made six years ago.  At Peace - https://vimeo.com/209876674

130

(11 replies, posted in General Discussion)

I recall that on the old Serif Community Forum William would disappear for around six months and then reappear.

But as we get older anyone not posting for a while is worrying.

I'm pleasantly surprised that MVPX6 decodes your rewrap as the video is h264.  Rewrap your Kodak' files the same way and you are halfway there.

Handbrake only renders to mp4 or mkv so won't help you converting to mov.

Shutter Encode is also frequently recommended by the Pros.   So you could also use it to convert your MVPX6 mov file exports to mp4.

Basically you are unfortunately stuffed without the unlock codes.

With "mov" files be wary.  Mov is only a container and it's the codec used inside that matters.  It may not decode all "mov" files.

Your biggest problem is having codecs to decode your source material.   If you overcome that hurdle and can export from MVPX6 as "mov" you could use Handbrake to convert the files to mp4.  Handbrake is a free and often recommended download and has a batch facility so you can let it convert a batch of files overnight.

133

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

Thanks Gordon, I'll investigate further.

134

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

Tell us more about the external power packs please.  I've seen them mentioned but never come across them.  Are they battery powered?

135

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

Yes technology has changed dramatically.  The most expensive item nowadays is your cameras Li-ion battery.

Gone are the days of using AA batteries, cheaper and purchasable almost anywhere.  Prior to that the Bolex Triple turret (zooms had yet to arrive) camera had a clockwork motor. No need to worry about batteries.

My Canon video cameras batteries disappoint me.  The advertised shooting time only applies the first day you charge up the battery.  Thereafter the capacity, as shown by the shooting time available, reduces with each recharge.  Even although I don't use my camera much the batteries are down to less than half capacity after five years.  Plus they discharge quickly even when they are just sitting on a shelf, not attached to my camera.

My older Panasonic batteries for my old SD tape camera are lasting much better.  They appear to be keeping their capacity better and keep their charge for long periods.

I only have genuine Canon and Panasonic batteries.  I recall Albert Ross having a bad experience with alternatives.

136

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

pberk wrote:

YES! .. But I wouldn't use the word "allowed".  I have little control over her.  Amy is an artist.  She bought that Lamy Safari pen in that shop in Devonport and still uses it.

Thanks Paul for the clarification.  I misinterpreted your comment - "The trick is to buy something -- then they don't object to being filmed" I wrongly assumed the scene was a set-up smile

137

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

Devonport - I nearly forgot.  My short 1979 film was for my movie club's "50 ft uncut competition".  That is no editing allowed.  It all had to be done with your camera at time of shooting.  With Std 8 you were allowed one splice being the one Kodak made after developing your film and splitting and joining the two halves.  Std 8 reels were 16 mm in width.

Making uncut films did require planning.  I'd take my title, then go out and shoot, then do the end title(s).  When converting to digital a few years ago I redid the title on the timeline and removed any flash frames.  These are the overexposed frames you sometimes got at the start of a scene as your camera got up to speed.

Doing superimposed titles was an extra challenge.  The film needed to be wound back and run through the camera a second time.  A nightmare with Super 8 cartridges.  I recall having a gadget that allowed me to wind back the film a short amount but it had to be done in a "changing bag".  That's a black bag with arms so you could work by feel in the dark.  Plus the hardest part was shooting twice on the same area of film.  We have it so easy nowadays.

138

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

Thanks Paul.  Yes it should look familiar as I took my shots only a few years previously to your visit.  Looking at my shooting records I find I made two trips plus used a few shots "leftover" when earlier shooting a different video.  The only real "hard work" was walking the streets.  Yes my script was written after a rough edit.  After recording and tidying up my narration file is dropped on the timeline and cut up.  My final editing is then done.  My videos are basically edited to carry the story in my narration.  Often my story will emerge as I'm editing.

Usually I have a rough idea of what I want to shoot before I visit a place. I then shoot away.  So easy with digital.  No worry about film costs.  I've visited Devonport many times.  As the crow flies it was around 10 km from where I lived.  So I was familiar with it plus in 1979 I made a short film movie of Devonport.  My 2012 video was a redo of this but not identical.  Some of the streets I wanted to revisit were hard to find as they had changed due to vegetation growth in the 33 year period.  In 1979 Devonport was looking run down especially in Victoria Road (named of course after Queen Victoria). 
My transfer of film to digital is here https://vimeo.com/128218066.  I have used some, or maybe all, of the original music.

Another SD video I made is of a 2007 ferry crossing with inset flashbacks to a similar trip in 1977. Another 30 year gap.  "Ferry" is here https://vimeo.com/29904500.  It also has several shots of Devonport.

PS:  You make good use of your "better half"!  Was she allowed to make the purchases?

139

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

Whilst going through some old videos to show at my monthly video group meeting I came across this old SD video I made of Devonport https://vimeo.com/50461456.  Only 5 minutes. An interesting corner of Auckland.

140

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

A unique experience -- "Bells of Dedham".  Runs about 10 min

Thanks Paul.  Plenty of exercise but we were all ten years younger then! Shooting while climbing up or down stairs isn't handy as three hands would be handy.  You did well.

Enjoyed the music.  Some sounded like "Lord of the Rings"?

141

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

Thanks Gordon.  Very nice.   It's what I'd call an Audio Visual.

I made something similar ten years ago.  Not as good as yours.  Mine was made to play Kevin MacLeod's "Last Kiss Goodnight", a track that I find haunting.

https://vimeo.com/98603064

142

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

Paul - thanks.  I recall seeing it on the Vegas forum.  I had forgotten the procedure was also called "looping".

Gordon - mp3 is a pain to synchronise due to the nature of its compression.  It's not suitable for accurate editing.  Years ago I used mp3 for my first digital video narration using MVPX6.  I cut my narration mp3 file (recorded outside MVP) on the timeline so each piece started where I wanted. After rendering I found most of it was out and cut in the wrong place.  Converting my mp3 to wav and using that solved the problem.  Converting your mp3s might help you but of course wav are much larger files.

143

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

Paul - it's an over-dub.

The original camera capture wasn't good with wind noise.  I intended to over-dub anyway.  I then repeated it when doing my narration. On the timeline I then tried to match up the waveforms.  But surprisingly I found I had to speed up my re-dub to match, quite considerably in a couple of places!  From memory there was one place when wind made it difficult to see the speech waveform on the original recording so the sync isn't perfect.

You have sharp eyes to spot it.

144

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

GB wrote:

I wonder what the metal frame near the end of your video is, or was, used for?

Looks like goal posts to me, with frame work for the net.

I never thought of that as it was out in the open.

145

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

But what I wonder about is why you don't make an appearance in them?

Simple - I'm behind the camera!  But here's one I made two years ago where I do appear at the beginning.  Made shortly after I moved into my retirement village.  The bush at the bottom has lost a few trees as has the village.  The Hebe bush I'm sure has now gone and a few other are dying off as they had their roots pulled out during a storm.  Plus nearby houses up high have had landslips and lost ground.

https://vimeo.com/538265156

146

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

Thanks Gordon.  It looks very brown and barren compared to my green corner of the planet.

I wonder what the metal frame near the end of your video is, or was, used for?

147

(676 replies, posted in MoviePlus)

pberk wrote:

Quiet here so I will post a video hoping to wake things up. 

This one is about a great little museum in Pasadena, The Norton Simon.

Thanks Paul.  Very interesting.

Here's one from myself.  Odds and ends from recent outings during our crazy summer.  Crazy because of the storms and intense rainfall.  Eight minutes long covering four places so each one's just a short visit.
 
Video Snapshots - https://vimeo.com/812726138

148

(4 replies, posted in PagePlus)

Vicki, with Serif having abandoned the Plus range your PPX9 is probably reaching a dead end when phoning "home" to check for updates. So it's unable to check.  As Alfred said "All of the ‘legacy’ installers have been removed from the Serif site."

149

(20 replies, posted in PagePlus)

Heather - when your fan runs faster it's because your pc/laptop is getting hot and needs more cooling.  It has nothing to do with your Serif software unless you are perhaps using MoviePlus and doing heavy processing such as rendering for hours.

If you are using a laptop make sure you are not blocking any of the ventilation inlets.

150

(20 replies, posted in PagePlus)

Heather - I've sent you a PM.