Skip to forum content
Alfred's Serif Users' Forums
An independent forum site for members of the Serif software community
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Active topics Unanswered topics
Tips and Announcements
Automated signup has been disabled for these forums. If you wish to register, please send an email to admin[at]punster[dot]me stating your preferred username.
Embedded images: Click on the
Add image to post link below the message box. Your photo will be uploaded to the postimage website and then shared here via a thumbnail link. Click on the thumbnail for a larger view.
Private messages: There is no pop-up alert for new PMs on these forums, so you need to look out for the PM link (near the top right-hand corner of any forum page) becoming bold.
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
Search options (Page 64 of 87)
Topics by Alfred User defined search
Posts found: 1,576 to 1,600 of 2,165
William wrote:Just different ways of thinking. Even if I was given it all "on a plate"
up to "Please find an anagram of chief and sak" I still would not have got fishcake.
A crossword clue should never be worded like that, since “sak” isn’t a proper word. However, “chief” and “ask” would work fine.
William wrote:But I don't think I would have got angle meaning fish. I would probably have thought of right angle, so something being upright, or something being correct.
Cryptic crossword clues are all about that kind of misdirection! It’s very common, for example, to see ‘flower’ in a clue, but it often refers to a river (i.e. ‘that which flows’).
Here’s a reminder of the clue that I posted yesterday:
Following battered hake and chips oddly another seafood dish (8)
If you deconstruct it, you get
F = Following
HAKECIS = hake and chips oddly (i.e. HAKE plus the odd letters of the word CHIPS)
FISHCAKE = F plus battered (i.e. anagrammed) HAKECIS
William wrote:Who is supposed to have demanded what?
I took Geoff’s comment to mean that Eleanor Roosevelt’s status as a former First Lady, rather than the lady herself, demanded greater respect.
William wrote:There were some posts, most from me, one from Alfred, until 28 October 2022.
Alfred added a Follow request to the thread.
I automatically follow a thread when I post to it, so I only have to explicitly submit a Follow request if I want to follow a thread without posting.
How about these ‘normal’ bats (England, ca. 13th century)?

Johnk wrote:Sometimes I love the internet.
And sometimes not so much, no doubt! Good to know that you resolved the problem.
William wrote:Alfred, do you know Gaelic?
No, not at all (apart from the numbers up to ten or so, and the odd phrase or sentence like the one I quoted).
William wrote:Interestingly, in Welsh the verb comes first.
That’s also true of Gaelic; e.g. “Bha an cat dubh” = “The cat was black”. Maybe it’s a general Celtic thing.
William wrote:I have just listened again several times and I make it that they used the first sixteen notes. I do not know how that relates to bars.
You may well be right about the number of notes! I’m afraid I simply counted the notes that I remembered in my head, without bothering to find a programme so I could check that I hadn’t truncated the sequence.
The bit about bars was lifted from something I read.
William wrote:I only recognized the first ten seconds of the music.
I believe they only used the first six bars (twelve distinct notes).
GB wrote:As Joe points out, the manufacturer is likely to be the same for both products.
Some years ago, Kelloggs advertised that “we don’t make breakfast cereals for anyone else”.
William wrote:The page has the following.
> 404 Page
> This is not the page you are looking for
If one reads it newsreader style then there we go.
But if one reads it in a different style ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihyjXd2C-E8

William
Alfred wrote:I don’t see anything particularly remarkable about wording on that page.
I see that we posted almost simultaneously!
William wrote:Ah. I think that you have clicked on it and the position of the pointer may be over a product.
I clicked on the link in your forum post, and I got a ‘404’ error page. Given that the linked page had the very specific name ‘handmade-air-dried-plantable-botanica-seed-and-petal-paper-280-300-gsm-100-cotton’, it wasn’t obvious to me that a 404 page was what I was actually meant to see.
I don’t see anything particularly remarkable about wording on that page.
That link gives me a ‘404’ error. Is it one of these products?
Being unfamiliar with the term ‘Bridezilla’, I looked it up! It seems to refer to someone being obsessively (and, by implication, unreasonably) demanding, and it would put me off giving a business my custom if that’s their view of me.
GB wrote:I find both Gordon's and Paul's video most interesting. Albert's and Eric's too. Keep 'em coming, please.
Ditto. And ditto. And ditto.
As a side note, near the beginning of Paul’s video there’s a classic fail in the autogenerated captions. It says: “and who are you I am deaf”!!
I’m with you on this one, William. If the award purports to be for the best PhD thesis, any and all background information seems irrelevant.
Welcome, Richard!
“You’ve Got Mail.”
At 300 ppi, 600 pixels would be only two inches, so why do you say “most model designs could fit” instead of “all model designs would fit” on an A4 sheet?
That reminds me of the old trick of using lemon juice as invisible ink, and then using the heat from a lightbulb to turn it brown so you can see it.
William wrote:Apparently some 350 gsm paper is thicker than other.
It’s a given that more heavily compressed paper is denser and thinner, but for a given paper type 350 gsm paper will be almost twice as thick as 180 gsm paper. Cartridge paper, for example, is thick but very flexible.
Posts found: 1,576 to 1,600 of 2,165